6.1 Example M&V Plan Example Measurement & Verification Plan for a Super ESPC Project February 2007 Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) Office of Energy ...
Text Previews (text result may be not accurate)
Example M&V Plan
Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP)
U.S. Department of Energy
Department of Energys Federal Energy
Management Program by Nexant, Inc., and La
document is posted on FEMPs web site at
www.eere.energy.gov/femp/financi
ng/superespcs_mvresources.cfm
Comments should be sent to
lwebster@nexant.com
6.1 /BBo;x [4;1 7;0 5;! 7;T] ;/Typ; /P;
gin;
tio;n /A;ttac;hed ;[/To;p] 0;/BBo;x [4;1 7;0 5;! 7;T] ;/Typ; /P;
gin;
tio;n /A;ttac;hed ;[/To;p] 0;Example M&V Plan /MCI;
1 ;/MCI;
1 ;Contents /MCI;
2 ;/MCI;
2 ;1. /MCI;
3 ;/MCI;
3 ;EXECUTIVE SUMMARY / M&V OVER
VIEW AND PROPOSED SAVINGS
ROPOSED
AVINGS
UMMARY
, W
PERATIONS AND
CHEDULE AND
EPORTING FOR
ERIFICATION
, P
, R
EPLACEMENT
EPORTING
EQUIREMENTS
ONSTRUCTION
ERIOD
EBATES
AND SAVINGS CALCULATION
6.1 /BBo;x [4;1 7;0 5;! 7;T] ;/Typ; /P;
gin;
tio;n /A;ttac;hed ;[/To;p] 0;/BBo;x [4;1 7;0 5;! 7;T] ;/Typ; /P;
gin;
tio;n /A;ttac;hed ;[/To;p] 0;Example M&V Plan /MCI;
1 ;/MCI;
1 ;5. /MCI;
2 ;/MCI;
2 ;ECM 3 CHILLER REPLACEMENT M&V PLAN AND SAVINGS
6.1 /BBo;x [4;1 7;0 5;! 7;T] ;/Typ; /P;
gin;
tio;n /A;ttac;hed ;[/To;p] 0;/BBo;x [4;1 7;0 5;! 7;T] ;/Typ; /P;
gin;
tio;n /A;ttac;hed ;[/To;p] 0;Example M&V Plan /MCI;
1 ;/MCI;
1 ;Background /MCI;
2 ;/MCI;
2 ;This document is a comprehensive M&V
Plan for a fictitious energy performance
contract project. This document is
common ECMs that comply with the
Provided in fulfillment of Super ESPC requirements,
Delivery Order Number FAKE34621
M&V Specialist
Email: axb@abceng.com
Fax: (201) 455-3439
Email:
rihandy@piscataway.gsa.gov
2/07
page 1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY / M&V OVERVIEW AND
PROPOSED SAVINGS CALCULATIONS
Proposed Annual Savings Overview
lighting, improvements to the central plant
chiller, and the addition of an energy
management control system (EMCS). This pr
oject will also result in improved lighting
maintenance costs. Chiller operations and
maintenance savings of $12,000 is due to the
replacement of a service contract with an ABC
Total
water cost
($/yr)
($/yr)
Total cost
($/yr)
Lighting
186,406
690
636
$15,339
$0
$15,339
899,252
3,069
$23,841
$0
$23,841
Chiller
194,119
502
663
$14,230
$12,000
$26,230
Total
1,321,032
1,191
4,368
$53,410
$12,000
$65,410
Utility usage for site during the period fr
om January to December 2002 iscompared to
2/07
page 2
(kWh/yr)
demand
(kW-yr)*
(MBtu/yr)
Other
(MBtu/yr)
(kGal/yr)
Total energy
(MBtu/yr)
Total proposed
project savings
1,321,032
1,191
4,509
entire site
9,195,271
31,890
NA
NA
31,383
% Total site
usage saved
14.4%
3.7%
14.4%
Project square
footage (KSF)
Total site
square footage
(KSF)
664
% Total site
MBtu = 10
Btu = 293 kWh
*Annual electric demand savings (kW/yr) is the sum of the monthly demand savings.
KSF = 10
schedules (e.g. 0.004313 MBtu / kWh).
M&V Plan Summary
measurement and verification (M&V) activities for each
of the three ECMs in order to estimate the act
Sections 3 through 5 of this document,
and are summarized in Table 1-3.
Table 1-3: M&V Plan Summary
ECM description
Summary of M&V plan
6.1 /BBo;x [4;1 7;0 5;! 7;T] ;/Typ; /P;
gin;
tio;n /A;ttac;hed ;[/To;p] 0;/BBo;x [4;1 7;0 5;! 7;T] ;/Typ; /P;
gin;
tio;n /A;ttac;hed ;[/To;p] 0;Example M&V Plan /MCI;
1 ;/MCI;
1 ;2. /MCI;
2 ;/MCI;
2 ;WHOLE PROJECT DATA / GLOBAL ASSUMPTIONS
Risk and Responsibility
Appendix of this document.
Energy, Water, and Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Rate
Data
Schedule and Reporting for Ve
rification Activities
The schedule of M&V submissions is summarized in Table 2.2.
fication Reporting Activities
Time of submission
Owners review and
Post-Installation Report
30 days after acceptance
performance period
The Post-Installation Report will be submitted
6.1 /BBo;x [4;1 7;0 5;! 7;T] ;/Typ; /P;
gin;
tio;n /A;ttac;hed ;[/To;p] 0;/BBo;x [4;1 7;0 5;! 7;T] ;/Typ; /P;
gin;
tio;n /A;ttac;hed ;[/To;p] 0;Example M&V Plan /MCI;
1 ;/MCI;
1 ;receive rebates for the lighting efficiency m
easure. Incentives will be provided directly
from PSE&G to the GSA.
Total rebate
T-8, 4-lamp
T-8, 2-lamp
Exit Sign LEDs
Dispute Resolution
event that a dispute does arise regarding issu
es such as baseline adjustments or use of
measured data, the issues will be jointly re
viewed and an agreeable resolution reached.
Otherwise, the arbitration clause in the Ma
nagement Plan of the Delivery Order will
2/07
page 6
6.1 /BBo;x [4;1 7;0 5;! 7;T] ;/Typ; /P;
gin;
tio;n /A;ttac;hed ;[/To;p] 0;/BBo;x [4;1 7;0 5;! 7;T] ;/Typ; /P;
gin;
tio;n /A;ttac;hed ;[/To;p] 0;Example M&V Plan /MCI;
1 ;/MCI;
1 ;3. /MCI;
2 ;/MCI;
2 ;ECM 1 LIGHTING M&V PLAN AND SAVINGS
6.1 /BBo;x [4;1 7;0 5;! 7;T] ;/Typ; /P;
gin;
tio;n /A;ttac;hed ;[/To;p] 0;/BBo;x [4;1 7;0 5;! 7;T] ;/Typ; /P;
gin;
tio;n /A;ttac;hed ;[/To;p] 0;Example M&V Plan /MCI;
1 ;/MCI;
1 ;3.2 /MCI;
2 ;/MCI;
2 ;Energy and Water Baseline Development
6.1 /BBo;x [4;1 7;0 5;! 7;T] ;/Typ; /P;
gin;
tio;n /A;ttac;hed ;[/To;p] 0;/BBo;x [4;1 7;0 5;! 7;T] ;/Typ; /P;
gin;
tio;n /A;ttac;hed ;[/To;p] 0;Example M&V Plan /MCI;
1 ;/MCI;
1 ;estimate the annual operating hours for each of
the seven usage groups with a precision
of 20% at 80% confidence. Initial sample
size for each usage group was eleven loggers
6.1 /BBo;x [4;1 7;0 5;! 7;T] ;/Typ; /P;
gin;
tio;n /A;ttac;hed ;[/To;p] 0;/BBo;x [4;1 7;0 5;! 7;T] ;/Typ; /P;
gin;
tio;n /A;ttac;hed ;[/To;p] 0;Example M&V Plan /MCI;
1 ;/MCI;
1 ;Z/MCI;
2 ;/MCI;
2 ;2/MCI;
3 ;/MCI;
3 ;C/MCI;
4 ;/MCI;
4 ;2/MCI;
5 ;/MCI;
5 ;v /MCI;
6 ;/MCI;
6 ;* /MCI;
7 ;/MCI;
7 ;Nn /MCI;
8 ;/MCI;
8 ;n (D.3); n
(D.4)
Z = Z statistic for desired confidence interval
p = desired precision
= coefficient of variation
N = population of usage groups or fixtures
n = sample size assuming
= sample size correct
Because the sample sizes n and n* must be
integers, the results from Equations D.3
earest integer value. The coefficient of
) is simply the standard deviati
on of the measurement divided by the
average measurement value.
= standard deviation
= average measured value
When the measurements have been taken, the C
can be quickly calculated. If the
is less than the assumed value, then
;n
;p
Fixture powers will be based on the aver
age of the measured values. Usage group
operating hours will be based on the average of the measured values. The coincidence
factor (CF, probability that operation coin
cides with building peak) for each usage
group will be based on the operating hours be
tween 1:00 and 4:00 p.m. as follows:
2/07
page 10
Example M&V Plan
Example M&V Plan
6.1 /BBo;x [4;1 7;0 5;! 7;T] ;/Typ; /P;
gin;
tio;n /A;ttac;hed ;[/To;p] 0;/BBo;x [4;1 7;0 5;! 7;T] ;/Typ; /P;
gin;
tio;n /A;ttac;hed ;[/To;p] 0;Example M&V Plan /MCI;
1 ;/MCI;
1 ;kW UsageGroup
post fixture
Energy (kWh) and demand (kW) savings will be calculated using Equation 3-2 and
kWh Savings =
u [ (kW UsageGroup
- kW UsageGroup
U,post
of Operation]
kW Savings =
u [(kW UsageGroup
- kW UsageGroup
U,post
kWh Savings
one year post-installation
kW Savings
Coincident kilowatt demand saving
kW UsageGroup
Lighting baseline demand for usage
kW UsageGroup
U,post
Lighting demand during post-
ximum percent of lighting
operating during at time building peak
Proposed Annual Savings for ECM
6.1 /BBo;x [4;1 7;0 5;! 7;T] ;/Typ; /P;
gin;
tio;n /A;ttac;hed ;[/To;p] 0;/BBo;x [4;1 7;0 5;! 7;T] ;/Typ; /P;
gin;
tio;n /A;ttac;hed ;[/To;p] 0;Example M&V Plan /MCI;
1 ;/MCI;
1 ;4. /MCI;
2 ;/MCI;
2 ;ECM 2 EMCS M&V PLAN AND SAVINGS
Option B was chosen for this measure because
of the concern that post-installation motor
operation hours may not turn out as estimat
the new control system readily lends itself to ongoing
measurement. The control system can track th
e actual run times of equipment with great
accuracy and very little added cost.
The following assumptions are employed for this M&V plan:
In the absence of this project, the pu
mp and fan performance would remain
6.1 /BBo;x [4;1 7;0 5;! 7;T] ;/Typ; /P;
gin;
tio;n /A;ttac;hed ;[/To;p] 0;/BBo;x [4;1 7;0 5;! 7;T] ;/Typ; /P;
gin;
tio;n /A;ttac;hed ;[/To;p] 0;Example M&V Plan /MCI;
1 ;/MCI;
1 ;Table 4-2: Equipment Nameplate
Data and Measured Power Draw
Equipment
Nameplate
Nominal
Nominal
(kW)
AHU-1 supply fan
HWP-1 hot water supply pump
Proposed Energy and Water
Savings Calculations and
Operations and Maintenance
and Other Cost Savings
O&M savings are not being claime
d or documented for this ECM.
Proposed Annual Savings for ECM
(kWh/yr)
(kW-yr)
Total
(MBtu/yr)
energy cost,
Year 1
($/yr)
1 ($/yr)
costs,
Year 1
($/yr)
Total
costs,
Year 1
($/yr)
Baseline use
1,266,002
158
4,321
$66,465
$15,291
$66,465
Post-installation
use
811,894
158
2,771
$42,624
$15,291
$42,624
454,108
1,550
$23,841
$23,841
Post-Installation M&V Activities
The points in the new EMCS system to be mo
nitored for use in savings calculations are
listed in Table 4-5. All of these points will be
trended meaning that there will be a
time stamp associated with each recorded point
value. From this information, the total
operating hours of the affected equipment for
the year will be calculated. Temperature
data will be collected and analyzed to ensure
that the operation of the control system is as
intended. Additional points will be collected fo
r ECM 3 (Chiller) so that this information
can be used to verify the performance of th
6.1 /BBo;x [4;1 7;0 5;! 7;T] ;/Typ; /P;
gin;
tio;n /A;ttac;hed ;[/To;p] 0;/BBo;x [4;1 7;0 5;! 7;T] ;/Typ; /P;
gin;
tio;n /A;ttac;hed ;[/To;p] 0;Example M&V Plan /MCI;
1 ;/MCI;
1 ;Table 4-5: EMCS Control Points for Savings Calculations /MCI;
2 ;/MCI;
2 ;Equipment
Chiller compressor motor
AHU-1 supply fan
CHWP-1 chilled water supply pump
CWP-1 condenser water pump
HWP-1 hot water supply pump
Outside air temperature
Analog temperature sensor
Outside humidity sensor
Chilled water supply temperature
Analog temperature sensor
request. In the case that some data are missi
ng, a check for a valid reason for missing data
will be made. If the data is truly missing, then operating hours for the period with missing
from a similar period. Sources of data used to make up for
missing data will be clearly identified and
will be described in the Annual Report.
kWh
kWh
aseline total
kWh
2/07
page 20
ECM 3 CHILLER REPLACEMENT M&V PLAN AND
The following figure will help illustrate the savings verification process:
Chiller Performance and Savings
400
kW New
kW Baseline
ASHRAE model for
baseline chiller
kW measured
2.
Estimate baseline chiller
300
1. Measure chiller load and
operating conditions.
demand at standard conditions.
Manufacturer's model for
new chiller
4.
Calculate kW reduction as
difference between baseline
and measured values.
200
3.
Measure the new chiller
demand.
100
100
200
300
400
Tons
Measure the chiller load (tons) from the chil
No other physical changes are planned to the condenser pumps, chilled water
pumps or the cooling tower.
ne model will be held c
onstant at 85ºF. The actual
condenser water temperature will be allo
wed to fall below 85ºF to improve part-
load performance.
temperature.
One month of monitoring of chiller demand and load variables was adequate to
develop an accurate model of th
e existing chiller performance.
The building plans no major projects, such
would significantly alter the current build
internal cooling loads.
Energy and Water Baseline Development
Data collection of the existing chillers
demand, entering and leaving chilled water
temperatures, and entering condenser wate
r temperature occurred during August and
September 2003. The data was collected in 15
-minute intervals using an Elite 6-channel
. In order to collect data over a full
and condenser water temperatures, chiller
demand) expected in the post-installation
period, the condenser and chil
led water temperatures were
12,000 Conversion from Btuh to tons
See Attachment 4.
2/07
page 23
6.1 /BBo;x [4;1 7;0 5;! 7;T] ;/Typ; /P;
gin;
tio;n /A;ttac;hed ;[/To;p] 0;/BBo;x [4;1 7;0 5;! 7;T] ;/Typ; /P;
gin;
tio;n /A;ttac;hed ;[/To;p] 0;Example M&V Plan /MCI;
1 ;/MCI;
1 ;CAP/MCI;
2 ;/MCI;
2 ;nom
Nominal full-load capacity of chiller (400 tons)
nom
Nominal full load chiller demand. The nominal kW is the full-load rating
multiplied by the nominal capacity (0.85 kW/ton
400 = 340 kW)
The maximum capacity (tons) of the chiller va
ries with operating parameters, and can be
0.001389
0.00375
0.00015
-0.000375
m
n
o
0.46371
chiller could not take advantage of reduced condenser water temperatures because of
physical operating limitations.
Proposed Energy and Water
Savings Calculations and
Operations and Maintenance
and Other Cost Savings
ABC Engineering assuming the chiller maintenan
ce contract for the new chiller. The cost
of these annual services will be $14,000, co
mpared to the existing contract for $26,000.
Proposed Annual Savings for ECM
Proposed annual savings are summarized in th
Table 5-2: Proposed Annual Savings for ECM 3 Chiller
(kWh/yr)
(kW/yr)
Total
(Mbtu/yr)
energy cost,
Year 1
($/yr)
1 ($/yr)
costs,
Year 1
($/yr)
Total
costs,
Year 1
($/yr)
Baseline use
500,004
1,292
1,707
$26,250
$10,403
$26,000
$62,653
Post-installation use
305,885
790
1,044
$16,059
$6,364
$14,000
$36,423
194,119
502
663
$10,191
$4,039
$12,000
$26,230
Post-Installation M&V Activities
After the new chiller has been installed
and commissioned, ABC Engineering and
Federal Center representatives will conduct a
post-installation inspection to verify that
the cost savings predicted. ABC Engineering will provide a Chiller Inspection Report
6.1 /BBo;x [4;1 7;0 5;! 7;T] ;/Typ; /P;
gin;
tio;n /A;ttac;hed ;[/To;p] 0;/BBo;x [4;1 7;0 5;! 7;T] ;/Typ; /P;
gin;
tio;n /A;ttac;hed ;[/To;p] 0;Example M&V Plan /MCI;
1 ;/MCI;
1 ;Using the monitored post-installation data, the baseline energy use will be computed
using the ASHRAE model and assuming sta
The new chillers performance will be compared to the manufacturers rated performance
annually to ensure that the chiller is opera
ting as expected. This will be accomplished by
using the manufacturers performance curv
performance curves used for
temperatures will be used with the manufacturers model.
Some degradation in chiller pe
rformance is expected over the course of the delivery order
contract (5 years), which has been considered
monitor the calculated kW/ton of the new chill
er and issue an alarm when this value
moves outside the expected range (0.40 - 1.10 kW/ton).
ity control procedures for checking the
measurements for reasonableness. Any and all missing intervals will be replaced either
by interpolation or use of average values. Su
calculations will also be provided electron
ically, in MS Excel spreadsheets. All
calculations will follow the procedure described in this M&V plan. In addition to the
reports, all monitored data will be submitted in electronic format.
PROPOSED APPROACH
Interest rates:
eering will work with the GSA to ensure that the best
possible financial terms are secured for this project.
Energy prices for this DO
6.1 /BBo;x [4;1 7;0 5;! 7;T] ;/Typ; /P;
gin;
tio;n /A;ttac;hed ;[/To;p] 0;/BBo;x [4;1 7;0 5;! 7;T] ;/Typ; /P;
gin;
tio;n /A;ttac;hed ;[/To;p] 0;Example M&V Plan /MCI;
1 ;/MCI;
1 ;RESPONSIBILITY/ DESCRIPTION /MCI;
2 ;/MCI;
2 ;PROPOSED APPROACH
fan and pump motor operating
performance period.
operating hours for equipment has
in case of substantial change in schedule.
6.1 /BBo;x [4;1 7;0 5;! 7;T] ;/Typ; /P;
gin;
tio;n /A;ttac;hed ;[/To;p] 0;/BBo;x [4;1 7;0 5;! 7;T] ;/Typ; /P;
gin;
tio;n /A;ttac;hed ;[/To;p] 0;Example M&V Plan /MCI;
1 ;/MCI;
1 ;RESPONSIBILITY/ DESCRIPTION /MCI;
2 ;/MCI;
2 ;PROPOSED APPROACH
for maintaining the fan and
pump motors so that the power
draws remain at the baseline
Chiller. The chiller is expected
to perform as rated by the